This
is the first time in this long Legend of Ponnivala story
where a question of social justice, a matter with extensive modern
implications, appears. When Kolatta offers his wife’s labour,
alongside his own, the king responds by raising the total payment he
promises in return. He offers only 16 measures of grain a month for
Kolatta’s labour, but 20 if his wife joins him. This is just a 25%
increase! Is that fair recognition of what his wife can/will
contribute by adding her labour? Let us leave this question aside
for a moment and first examine some other aspects of the interaction
between this (unnamed) Chola ruler and his newly arrived visitor.
It
will be noticed right away that there are three men sitting on the
raised platform at the front of the king’s reception hall. These
are representatives of three great lines of kings in South Indian
history, the Chola, Chera and Pandya family groupings. In this story
the three are shown to collaborate closely, though with the Chola
given the central position. The other two rulers are visiting him
and the three have been discussing various political decisions
together. The Chola (always un-named) takes the lead and asks
Kolatta who he is. Kolatta politely answers that he is a farmer from
the land known as Vellivala and then introduces his wife Ariyanacci.
What
is Vellivala and is it the same as Ponnivala? No, these places are
subtly different! Vellivala is the area where the nine brothers were
“created” and set down in a forest to begin farming, notably by
the great goddess Parvati herself. It is the “Eden” in this
legend and its location is not clearly given (or known from other
sources). Kolatta exits this seemingly idyllic place due to drought
and famine. Was that famine “due” to his trying to start
agriculture there? We do not know. However, we do know that Kolatta
never returns to Vellivala and it is never mentioned again. Instead
(as we will see) this “first farmer” will later be sent to
Ponnivala (which is not too far from Velliavala) to set up farming
there instead. The difference is that he is now entering that second
area backed by a Chola king, rather than backed by a goddess. I will
say more about this later, in my next blog post.
Significantly,
in this current video clip, the king comments to Kolatta: “I did
not know that there were farmers in Vellivala!” His observation
reinforces a more general impression clearly created by the story
tellers: Vellivala is a place inhabited exclusively by non-farmers.
The Chola does not seem surprised, however, to learn that there are
people residing in Vellivala. He just didn’t know that there were
famers there. The king might reasonably have pursued this and asked:
“How did you and your family learn farming in Vellivala?” But the
king doesn’t follow this line of reasoning. In sum, Kolatta is
never “put on the spot” regarding the details of his ancestry.
It
is also important to note that the king seated to the Chola’s right
now adds a sympathetic follow-up comment. “Yes, I have heard,”
he says, “that there has been a drought there. It is a terrible
thing.” But then the Chola gets back to business by asking more
directly: “Are you looking for some sort of gift?” The tone he
uses is accusatory and the implication is that many impoverished
people come to see him looking for a handout. Nonetheless, his
question provides a convenient foil, allowing Kolatta to clarify that
he has not come asking for gifts but, rather, that he is a farmer
looking for work. Kolatta maintains his self respect with this reply
and manages to impresses the Chola monarch at the same time. “Ah,”
the king replies, “We have work for you.”
Now
the Chola states his terms. He can pay Kolatta 16 measures of grain
a month. Kolatta counters, using a bargaining tactic. “We cannot
live on 16 measures of grain a month. My wife can work in the fields
as well. Can you give us twenty?” The king agrees readily and
sends the couple off to start their work right away. Now the
question this blog post is supposed to address: Was the Chola king’s
offer to Kolatta fair? I would welcome input from readers on this
point. I, myself, do not think we have enough information to answer
authoritatively. We do not know how much extra labour the wife will
contribute. Will it be full time? We also must acknowledge that
there is a general tradition in this area of paying women only about
half as much for their physical labour as men, even today. Probably
that custom has along past. Is it fair? Are women just as strong?
Can they do as much? Are the jobs they do identical with those men
do? Men usually plough while women plant. Which requires more
skill?. Which requires more physical stamina and strength? These
are ago-old issues and there is much to debate here. I leave it to
my readers to contribute their own thoughts to the blog. This is
also a good question to pose to students in a student classroom... or
to members of a debating club.
Signing
off for now,
“Blogger”
Brenda Beck
The
Sophia Hilton Foundation of Canada
Have you experienced The Legend of Ponnivala on TV or in print? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
To find out more about The Legend of Ponnivala -- the legend, the series, the books, and the fascinating history behind the project, visit www.ponnivala.com.
Read Part 9 ==>
<== Read Part 7Have you experienced The Legend of Ponnivala on TV or in print? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
To find out more about The Legend of Ponnivala -- the legend, the series, the books, and the fascinating history behind the project, visit www.ponnivala.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment